Thursday, September 30, 2010

My thoughts on "Battleground Schools"


Well Susan, that was an interesting article you wrote.  This is all brand-new to me, so I have no idea how correct you are, but I’ll take your word for it.  I see you’ve cast mathematics as a boat caught in the tides of politics, and I can’t disagree with that interpretation.  However, since you’ve opened the door to politics, I am now inclined to offer my own thoughts in that direction.

As I said, I cannot dispute the influence of politics upon curriculum.  The recent evolution/creation debates in the southern USA have shown that clearly enough.  However, I will choose not to take sides in these math wars.  I contend that the NCTM, New Math, and Progressivist schools may all be equally viable or unviable, and that in the very act of fighting over which style gets implemented, we have created an even greater monster.

Forgive me for injecting my own political philosophies into this curricular debate, but I believe that education is best served by allowing teachers and schools the maximum amount of individual freedom.  This implies no standardized curriculum, and thus no need to argue over which curriculum is best.

To explain: If the premise of Susan’s essay is correct, and there have been only three broad styles of curriculum to come and go in the last hundred years, then we have a system that changes slower than molasses in January.  By forcing all schools in the province to adopt the same curriculum, we have put an end to diversity, experimentation, and evolution in math teaching.

Surely the current curriculum is not ideal.  As it stands now, with all schools bound under a single governing body, any change (if it is permitted at all) will be slowed to a crawl by bureaucracy.  However, if each school were free to pursue its own agenda, we would see an explosion of different forms of teaching, and those methods that prove to be superior would quickly be adopted by other schools.  The “open-sourcing” of curriculum would allow our schools to evolve rapidly in an organic way.

In this scenario, arguments over the best umbrella curriculum would quickly recede as schools pick and choose methods to suit their own unique situation.  Those that don’t work will see their students stolen away by schools with better programs.  The spirit of competition will allow education to escape the stifling grip of top-down curriculum.

But now I am over 300 words.  In summary, there will never be a “one size fits all” solution, and any attempt to find one is just pissing into the wind.

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Letters from the future!

Dear Mr. Spoering.

You ruined my life.  I used to be a bright, energetic child with sky-high potential.  Now I'm selling myself to support my crack habit.  The government took my child away and I have nothing left to live for.  How did this come to pass, you ask?  It was you.  You did this to me.  You failed me in math 10, and when my Mother saw my report card, she flipped.  She spat her coffee upon the floor and screamed at me for "throwing my future away".  Father heard her torrent of rage and exclaimed, "that's the last straw!  I want a divorce, devil-woman!"  Well, I won't bore you with all the details (as if you cared!) but from that moment on, my life entered a downward spiral.  As a child of a broken home, I turned to drugs and crime to fill the void in my life, and now here I am at the lowest of lows!  If only you'd been a better teacher, then I wouldn't have been the thorn that drove my parents apart!

You suck.

Sincerely, your ex-student.




Dear Mr. Spoering

You are the spirit of divinity embodied in man.  Like Jesus, but with better hair.  Everything I am, I owe to you.  When I entered your class in grade 10 as a poor unloved orphan, I thought I was doomed to a life of toil and drudgery.  I thought I had no talent and no future.  But you helped me to see my own talent, and encouraged me all the way as I became the BC Matholympic champion!  I then knew that I could do anything.  Now I run a billion-dollar investment firm and have a smokin' hot wife who thinks my brain is sexy.  I never could have done it if you didn't believe in me! 

Attached is a check for $3.14 million dollars.  Just a little token of my appreciation.  God bless you, you saint!

Hugs and kisses, your ex-student.

Thursday, September 23, 2010

Interview Response for Paul, Meghan, and Vincent

 
All of the responses from the student confirmed many of the points presented during our in-class discussions.  The student is in Grade 12 and she enjoys learning in general which includes the subject of math.  She enjoys the fact that she can and does use some of the things that are taught in math class and apply in to real life situations.  This is similar to how many of us felt when we were taking math in high school.  One interesting point that she brought up was the fact that she enjoys learning how to use calculators.  We can take this as a reminder to keep up to date on current technologies that may be applicable to the teaching of math and try different ways of incorporating those technologies.  We can use these technologies as teaching aids and encouraging the students to understand how to use these technologies to apply the math skills that they learn. 

Her response to “What are your dislikes?” was not surprising.  The enjoyment of math disappears when the teacher explains things so quickly that she doesn’t understand.  She mentioned that if she was the teacher, she would teach math slower but understood that this would mean that the entire curriculum may not be taught in time.  The student also mentioned she sometimes drifted off without meaning to when the teacher is lecturing.  Then she would catch herself and spend time trying to catch up what the teacher had previously said.  All of this has been brought up in this class and in other classes as well: the concept of teaching quality versus quantity.  In order to prepare students for the next year, the curriculum should be followed, but if the curriculum is taught instrumentally and monotonously, then the students are not really learning.  Teachers should be striving to teach the curriculum in a timely manner using interactive, relational techniques.  While this may be easier said than done, it should always be one of our goals as educators. 

The student did see math as being useful in life.  She feels that she has already been taught everything in math that she needs for life.  Specific examples included going to a store and calculating that she had enough money for specific items.  She also mentioned the ability to calculate taxes as being a useful skill.  She didn’t mention much use in math skills beyond basic addition, subtraction and multiplication. 

As a teacher, while you want your students to be successful and thrive in your class, you also have to be realistic.  Not all students are stellar math students and in some cases, you have to be honest with them and let them know that they will not get high marks in your math class.  That does not mean you don’t keep on encouraging and teaching them, but you also need to ensure that they understand that, despite their low math marks, they will still succeed in life even if they don’t go any further in their math education.  These two viewpoints reflect the reality of math education and in some situations, as a teacher, you have to realize, understand and accept the needs and limitations of your students and not just be focused on the possibilities and potentials of the students.


We also interviewed the Head of the Mathematics Department at a small Vancouver school to gain insight from her experience in teaching secondary mathematics. We asked for her advice on how to handle students who hate mathematics. In Mrs. X's experience, when students arrive to high school they are usually a “math mess”. This hate and fear of mathematics usually originates at home and is further escalated when the primary schools give students an insufficient mathematical grounding.  Mrs. X's dialogue demonstrates that mathematics is a cumulative subject and weakness at any level will affect the ability of students to perform and learn mathematics at a higher level. Thus to improve secondary students' math interest, there needs to be a change in the attitudes coming from home and in the students’ primary education.

We inquired how she might respond to a student who says “I hate math.” Mrs. X handles this situation by relating to her students honestly. Using honesty as a teacher creates a trusting relationship between the educator and student, and in turn the student is more likely to listen and respond to the teacher's advice. Reflecting that hatred is usually a result of fear and not being able to do things well, Mrs. X would discuss with the student what actions they both could take to move the student forward. Mrs. X's approach to handle a student's hatred of math emphasizes the student's responsibility in changing their attitude. Admittedly students will probably be sceptical that math skills can improve, so she explained you have to proceed gradually and promote situations where a student can be successful. In our dialogue with Mrs. X we learned that being realistic, engaging and encouraging can stimulate a more positive attitude towards math.

We were also introduced to methods for handling differing levels of ability within the classroom. Mrs. X acknowledges that every person learns differently and recommends that teachers give their students opportunities to learn in different ways. In her classroom she uses visual and auditory teaching methods, as well as activities that involve the students moving around. Further she explains the importance of being able to rephrase and present materials in many ways. The ideas Mrs. X uses to stimulate learning in her classroom reflect the philosophy that all students should be able learn given the proper stimulus.  As teachers we are responsible for acquiring a wide rage of tools, abilities and techniques to teach any group of students.

As well as engaging her students mathematically, Mrs. X's strategy is to keep her students consistently interested and invested. She relates teaching to selling a product. The delivery must be captivating, as most students like the presentation of the material more than the math itself. Mrs. X makes mathematics applicable to the real world, which makes it important to her students. She looks at real world applications in everyday life and makes her students think about news articles, history and things they care about. Her goal is to “make them think and responsible for it.” This approach deflects from the common perception that math has no purpose in “real life.” She proves to them through each example that what they are learning is relevant and useful. This probably generates more success in learning and retention because most students learn best by making connections between what they are studying and what they already know. Mrs. X will also engage her students physically in the classroom. She might have them move around the classroom, or engage them by having them put a finger on their nose when they get the right answer. This example of classroom teaching demonstrates the need to know your audience and their needs.

Lastly we inquired about Mrs. X's view on the curriculum. She is very displeased and disappointed with the new math curriculum. In her opinion it is not challenging enough for students, is not preparing students for university and will not stand up globally.  

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Microteaching Debrief

After attempting to teach my group how to solve a rubik's cube in ten minutes, one thing is clear:  it takes WAY longer than 10 minutes to learn how to solve a rubik's cube.  I thought, "hey, it takes me two minutes to solve this thing, they should be able to follow my moves if I slow it down by a factor of five." 

Boy, was I ever wrong.  They didn't even know what the "green side" was.  I said, "see this side with the green in the middle?  This is the green side.  Move this green and orange piece right here."  Seemed simple to me.  What happened?  They couldnt remember which side was the green side.  They moved the wrong piece.  They moved the right piece to the wrong place. Everything that could possibly go wrong, went wrong.  Every mistake that could be made, was made.  Every instruction was messed up somehow.

Are these people stupid?  No, they all have degrees in math, they're very smart.  I guess I'm the stupid one for thinking that it could be taught so quickly.  It's a good lesson in patience, anyway.  When I try to teach more complicated concepts to much younger people, there will surely be even more chaos.

The group's feedback pretty much matched my own views.  They complimented me on my helpful teaching but agreed that 10 minutes was far too short a time to learn the cube.

Failure as this was, we all learned an important lesson in patience.

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Lesson Plan: Rubik's Cube





WHAT
HOW LONG
MATERIALS
BRIDGE
Look at this thing!  Don't you wish  you could solve it?  Impress the ladies with your rubik's skills!
30 seconds
Rubik's Cubes
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Students will be able to solve a rubiks cube (hopefully).


TEACHING OBJECTIVES
Get everyone to break down the cube into a step-by-step process, rather than a daunting whole.


PRE TEST
Have you ever solved a cube before?  Do you know the vocabulary of the cube?
30 seconds

PARTICIPATORY LEARNING
Students will follow my lead through the many steps of solving the cube. They will also learn to translate written cube notation into movements.
8 minutes

POST TEST
Students will attempt to solve the cube independently and fail because it can't be learned in 10 minutes.  But maybe they'll take it home and try again. 
1 minute allotted during lesson.  Really, it'll take them much longer.

SUMMARY
There will be no summary because they'll still be working on it when class ends.  Cubing is never finished.  Even when you solve it, you just scramble it up again and try to do it faster.


Monday, September 20, 2010

Response to Video

I thought the way he taught the class was brilliant.  I want to steal his method for my own class.  He is teaching math as one would teach a language.  It's a good idea, since at the elementary level, math is essentially a language.  He needs to communicate the language (add, multiply, x, negative, dot dot dot...) and syntax (brackets, order of operations.)

I recently had a friend, an experienced language teacher, teach me some Japanese.  He started as this math teacher started, without any introduction.  "Watashi Wa James".  (My name is James).  In math, the teacher began "this is one.  one, two, three."  The Japanese teacher does not start by saying "watashi wa means 'my name is'", and the math teacher does not begin by saying "these are points on a number line."  Some concepts are best learned by immersing yourself in them until they feel natural.  This is the way we all learn language as children, it's the way language is taught to adults, and I feel that it works very well as a way of teaching elementary math.

Friday, September 17, 2010

Memorable Math Teachers

I have only one really memorable math teacher.  For the most part they seemed to be rather boring people.  I think I'll try to break that mould.

Let's call her Mrs. Barrymore.  (She always reminded me of Drew Barrymore for some reason.  Not a good sign.)  She was young and friendly and kind...and, well, stupid.  A dumb blonde, as it were.  I remember how she always had a calculator on hand to perform basic arithmetic.  One example I remember clearly: calculating the angles of a triangle.  180 - 150.  Difficult problem.  Fortunately she had her calculator.

She didn't only teach math.  She taught general grade 10 science as well, and I was fortunate enough to be in that class too.  She provided me with the teacher quote of the year when we were learning some basic ecology.  She asked us to name some organisms that live in the desert.  I raised my hand and said "snakes!".  She was quick to correct me.  "Snakes don't live in the desert."  I think I was too stunned to make an argument of it.  I had a good laugh about it with my parents that night.

I think the bad teachers have done more than the good ones to inspire me to teach.  I kept thinking throughout the class, "I could do a better job of this than you."  And so now I will.

Monday, September 13, 2010

EDCP 342A Assignment 1

I recall a video I once saw.  It was made by an elementary math teacher and it consisted of her campaigning against a new relational-based math curriculum.  She explained how the simple algorithms for addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division that we all learned in school were being replaced by an aggregation of methods meant to target every conceivable learning style.  There were visual-based multiplication tables, auditory methods, tactile methods, and word problems.  It all seemed like a good idea that would help students to fully understand mathematics.

The new curriculum was a complete disaster.  Test scores plummeted.  Universities complained that high school graduates couldn’t do problems by hand.   Basic arithmetic skills were lost in a maze of “understanding”.  And so, this math teacher campaigned for a return to the simple algorithm-based approach that had successfully taught the basic skills for decades.

I sympathize with her.  I am a relational learner myself.  I strive for holistic understanding and reject easy memorization.  But I was brought up in an instrumental system, and I thrived in it.  I am aware that I should not extend my experience to the school system as a whole.  Perhaps if the system was relational-based, then a different person would have thrived in it and would now be taking this class while I mop floors for a living.

But let us consider instrumental learning to be the ‘How’ and relational learning to be the ‘Why’.  Mathematics are a tool of science.  For most people, it is enough to be able to use a tool without knowing why it works.  For example, it takes only one man to invent a circular saw; thousands then can use it to great benefit.  Should we not simply teach everyone how to use the tool, and let only the truly self-motivated bother with asking why?